This study focuses on people who have been diagnosed with heart failure (a condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to the body), have left bundle branch block (LBBB, a condition in which the electrical impulse traveling to the left ventricle is delayed or fully blocked), and whose doctor has recommended that they receive an implant of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). A CRT-D device is designed to monitor and treat heart rhythm problems (arrhythmias). The study will compare 2 ways to pace the heart to treat heart failure: cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP). CRT is the standard approach of implanting a pacing lead (LV lead) in a vein on the surface of the left ventricle of the heart to deliver heart failure therapy. The other way (LBBAP) uses a lead (INGEVITY+TM pace/sense lead) implanted in the left bundle branch area (LBBA) of the heart. This lead is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but its use in this study is considered experimental. Participants will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups. Participants in the CRT group will receive the same device system and lead implant locations as they would have if they did not participate in the study. Those in the LBBAP group will receive the same CRT-D device system as they would have if they did not participate in this study, as well as the LBBAP lead (INGEVITY+) implanted in the LBBA location.
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing versus Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure